The appeal is allowed and the Central Board of Film Censor is directed to furnish the required information except the details relating to the privacy of any individual such as a residential address, and phone number within 10 days. Download Order
From the contents of the appeal it is found that the appellant has made request that he is require certified copies of approved minutes of PCP’s meeting dated 15-05-2008 and 01-10-2010 vide which penalty was imposed on account of over and above enrollment without considering the record and… Read More »Order on Appeal No: 2509-02/23 Kaleem Ahmed Vs Pharmacy Council of Pakistan
In the instant case, it is observed that the point raised does not related to an information but only a question which does not constitute an “information” within the meaning of RTI Act, 2017. Therefore, the appeal does not lie within jurisdiction of Pakistan Information Commission, hence, does… Read More »Order in Appeal No: 1352-09/21 Irfan Jehangir Wattoo Vs Federal Public Service Commission
In the instant appeal, the appellant has sought copy of an enquiry report which was held against him. The respondent public body has raised objection that as per Section 6 of the Right of Access to Information Act, 2017, the record of inquiry is not public record hence… Read More »Order on Appeal No: 2301-10/22 Tariq Rahim Vs Pakistan International Airline
Under Section 17 of Right of Access to Information Act, 2017 an applicant who is not satisfied by the decision of designated official by him within the time fixed. He may, within the period not exceeding 30 days after either receiving the decision or after the time limit… Read More »Order on Appeal No: 2297-10/2022 Dr. Saeed Ahmed Vs Oil and Gas Development Company – OGDCL
In the instant appeal, the appellant has sought copy of an enquiry report which was held against him under show cause notice no. CDU-12-2021-003 DATED 06/12/2021. The respondent public body has raised objection that as per Section 6 of the Right of Access to Information Act, 2017, the… Read More »Order on Appeal No: 2298-10/22 Farooq-e-Azam Vs Pakistan International Airline
The appellant, while filing appeal dated 26-9-22, submitted that the respondent FPSC, while appearing before the Hon’ble Lahore High Court, Lahore through its letter dated 23-12-2021 made the following reply: “the recruitment process is carried out in the light of notified recruitment rules and as per general instructions… Read More »Order on Appeal No: 2282-10/22 Omer Jehangir Vs Federal Public Service Commission
The representative of the respondent appeared before the commission and submitted that if an order is passed regarding the provision of the information public body would have no objection in providing the information. However, it is submitted that volume of the record is huge and it is not… Read More »Order on Appeal No. 2309-10/22 Muhammad Nawaz Vs Ministry of Energy (Petroleum Division)
This Commission has already held in different appeals that documents submitted by firms/individuals to a public body for contracts are public documents as these documents reveal level of competence of the firms/individuals to carry out tasks funded by the tax-payers of the country. Download Order