In the instant appeal, the protest of the appellant pertaining to the query 4 & 5 is not sustainable as the respondent has informed the appellant that Tariff and Slab wise rates are being determined by the NEPRA and the same is available on their website. The point-wise comparison depicts that the asking public body has addressed all the queries raised by the appellant. The points of dissatisfaction in the rejoinder are not reasonable and appealing therefore does not warrant further interference of the Commission.
The appeal is disposed of having borne fruit.