This commission holds that once a citizen asks reasons for not to be considered for a given post, mere statement that the person “was not eligible for the said post”, is not enough. The reasons are available with the Respondent in the shape of marks obtained in written tests, marks allotted based on experience, etc. and reasons are also recorded in the remarks of the interview/recruitment committee and the applicant has the right to know what remarks were made by the members of the interview/recruitment committee.
This commission maintains that the Appellant has right of access to certified copy of working paper pertaining to her representation.