Welcome to Pakistan Information Commission   Click to listen highlighted text! Welcome to Pakistan Information Commission
Skip to content
Home » Home » Order on Appeal No 455-08/20 Saima Tasneem Vs Pakistan Procurement Regulatory Authority (PEPRA) Board Members

Order on Appeal No 455-08/20 Saima Tasneem Vs Pakistan Procurement Regulatory Authority (PEPRA) Board Members

The commission directed that copy of this Order along with copies of the record as available on the file be sent to Director General, Federal Investigation Agency, (FIA) to investigate whether the discrepancy between the documents made available by PPRA to this commission and their copies circulated by PPRA to its Board Members constitutes an offence under Section 22 (1) (d) and (2) of the Right of Access to Information Act 2017, and, any resultant unlawful hiring or termination of PPRA employees.

The commission also directed that copies of this Order be sent to PPRA Board Members, Secretary to Prime Minister, Secretary, Establishment Division and the Appellant for information and necessary action.

The commission held that the fact that representatives of Cabinet Division and PPRA Board Members submitted copies available with the Cabinet Division and PPRA Board Members were different than those made available to this commission by PPRA clearly suggests that powers pertaining to the recruitment of employees were unlawfully delegated to MD, PPRA. As such, Secretary, Cabinet Division, as head of controlling body of PPRA and Secretary, Finance, as Chairman of PPRA Board need to determine the factors behind this discrepancy and ensure that this matter is neither covered-up nor brushed under the carpet.

This commission is of the view that this is not a matter of mere error and omission but an extremely serious matter of unlawful appropriation of powers through tampering of official records. As such, it has serious consequences for PPRA employees and its functioning as an important regulatory body, established to ensure judicious utilizations of public funds in public procurements. This commission hopes that it is only a one-off case and not a trend.
The commission observed that this is prima facie a case of destruction or, tampering of official records, or both. As such, it needs to be investigated as an offence under Section 22 (1) (d) and (2) of the Right of Access to Information Act which is as under:
(d) “Destroying a record without lawful authority,

(2) In addition to any other action that may be taken under any other law for the time being in force, any person who wilfully destroys a record which at the time it was destroyed was the subject of an application for access to information which is the subject of an application or appeal, with the intention of preventing its disclosure under this Act, commits an offence punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years or with fine which shall not be less than one hundred thousand rupees or with both”.

As such, this commission is obligated to refer all record on the file to relevant agencies as required under Section 20 (1) (h) of the Act which is as under:
“The information commission after determination of wilful destruct of record shall refer such matters to the relevant agencies”
This commission is of the view that this matter needs to be thoroughly investigated by Director General, Federal Investigation Agency, (FIA). The commission hopes that if FIA investigation determines that the documents have been tempered with for nefarious ends, those involved will be brought to justice.

Download Order 

Checking...
Skip to content Click to listen highlighted text!